Research article | Open Access
International Journal of Excellent Leadership 2026, Vol. 6(1) 77-88
pp. 77 - 88
Publish Date: June 30, 2026 | Single/Total View: 0/0 | Single/Total Download: 0/0
Abstract
This qualitative study explores why certain leaders remained in their roles during the COVID-19
crisis and how organizational citizenship behavior (OCB), perceived organizational support
(POS), and personal faith contributed to their staying power. Six leaders from diverse U.S.
sectors described rapid change, isolation, blurred home and work boundaries, and emotional
strain. Thematic analysis revealed four core influences on persistence: faith as a source of moral
grounding and stability; altruistic concern for others; the disciplined maintenance of standards
despite uneven support; and integrity-based decision making within an individualistic culture.
Participants continued to enact behaviors associated with OCB, including reliability, compassion,
constructive engagement, and responsible organizational involvement. Faith practices helped
reframe adversity, supported coping, and reinforced identity alignment. The findings suggest that
leader persistence relies more on spiritual grounding, moral meaning, and relational commitment
than on external incentives. Organizations are encouraged to acknowledge moral labor,
strengthen community, and cultivate supportive environments that protect leader well-being.
Keywords: leadership retention, organizational citizenship behavior, faith and resilience, burnout, perceived organizational support and burnout, qualitative phenomenology
APA 7th edition
McKinnon, C. (2026). Faith, Burnout, and Staying Power: A Qualitative Study of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Leadership Resilience During Crisis. International Journal of Excellent Leadership, 6(1), 77-88.
Harvard
McKinnon, C. (2026). Faith, Burnout, and Staying Power: A Qualitative Study of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Leadership Resilience During Crisis. International Journal of Excellent Leadership, 6(1), pp. 77-88.
Chicago 16th edition
McKinnon, Cherie (2026). "Faith, Burnout, and Staying Power: A Qualitative Study of Organizational Citizenship Behavior and Leadership Resilience During Crisis". International Journal of Excellent Leadership 6 (1):77-88.
The new world of crises and crisis management: Implications for policymaking and research. Review of Policy Research, 26(4), 367–377. doi: 0.1111/j.1541-1338.2009.00389.x
Bolino, M. C., Hsiung, H. H., Harvey, J., & LePine, J. A. (2014). “Well, I’m tired of tryin’!” Organizational citizenship behavior and citizenship fatigue. Journal of Applied Psychology, 100 (1), 56–74. doi:10.1037/a0037583.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101. doi:10.1191/1478088706qp063oa.
Bundy, J., Pfarrer, M. D., Short, C. E., & Coombs, W. T. (2017). Crises and crisis management: Integration, interpretation, and research development. Journal of Management, 43(6), 1661–1692. doi:10.1177/0149206316680030
Burke, P. J., & Stets, J. E. (2009). Identity theory. Oxford University Press. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780195388275.001.0001.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1985). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior. Plenum. doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-2271-7
Duffy, J. A., & Lilly, J. D. (2013). Do individual needs moderate the relationships between organizational citizenship behavior, organizational trust and perceived organizational support? Journal of Behavioral and Applied Management, 14(3), 185–197. doi: Semantic Scholar Corpus ID: 146509116
Gaitho, P. R. (2019). Influence of religion on leadership styles and leadership roles: A critical literature review. Microeconomics and Macroeconomics, 7(1), 8-11. doi:10.5923/j.m2economics.20190701.02
Gill, M. J. (2014). The possibilities of phenomenology for organizational research. Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 118–137. doi::10.117771094428113518348
Greenleaf, R. K. (1998). The power of servant-leadership. Berrett-Koehler. ISBN-13: 978-1626563926
Kowalczyk, O., Roszkowski, K., Montane, X., Pawliszak, W., Tylkowski, B., & Bajek, A. (2020). Religion and faith perception in a pandemic of COVID-19. Journal of Religion and Health, 59(6), 2671–2677. doi:10.1007/s10943-020-01088-3.
Lavine, M. (2012). Exploring the relationship between organizational citizenship behavior, positive deviance, and organizational performance. Journal of Business and Psychology, 27(2), 197–212. doi: 0.1007/s10869-011-9245-z.
Maslach, C., & Leiter, M. P. (2016). Understanding the burnout experience: Recent research and its implications for psychiatry. World Psychiatry, 15(2), 103–111. doi:10.1002/wps.20311
McKinnon, C. E. (2022). Why leaders stay instead of quitting: A qualitative exploration of organizational citizenship behavior amid crises (Order No. 29061166). ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global. (2645542960).
Moustakas, C. (1994). Phenomenological research methods. Sage. doi: 10.4135/9781412995658.
Organ, D. W. (1988). Organizational citizenship behavior: The good soldier syndrome.Lexington Books. doi: 10.1017/S0263323X0000392X
Organ, D. W. (1997). Organizational citizenship behavior: It’s construct clean-up time. Human Performance, 10(2), 85–97. doi:10.1207/s15327043hup1002_2
Patterson, K. A. (2004). Servant leadership: A theoretical model.Servant Leadership Research Roundtable, Regent University. https://www.regent.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/patterson_servant_leadership.pdf
Podsakoff, N. P., Whiting, S. W., Podsakoff, P. M., & Blume, B. D. (2009). Individual- and organizational-level consequences of organizational citizenship behaviors: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 94(1), 122–141. doi: 10.1037/a0013079]
Rockstuhl, T., Dulebohn, J. H., Ang, S., & Shore, L. M. (2020). Leader–member exchange and culture: A meta-analysis across 23 countries. Journal of Applied Psychology, 107(3), 333–356. doi:10.1037/apl0000434
Schieman, S., Badawy, P. J., Milkie, M. A., & Bierman, A. (2021). Work-life conflict during the COVID-19 pandemic. Socius, 7, 1–19. doi:10.1177/2378023120982856
Sloan, A., & Bowe, B. (2014). Phenomenology and hermeneutic phenomenology: The philosophy, the methodologies, and using hermeneutic phenomenology to investigate lecturers’ experiences of curriculum design. Quality & Quantity, 48(3), 1291–1303. doi:10.1007/s11135-013-9835-3
Wang, Q., & Wang, C. (2020). Reducing turnover intention: Perceived organizational support for frontline employees. Frontiers of Business Research in China, 14(6). doi:10.1186/s11782-020-00074-6